THE THEORY
The
key
feature
to
the
consultancy
offered
is
the
use
of
a
new
scientific
application
that
adds
more
granularity
to
the
definition
of
time.
Contemporary
sciences
understand
time
to
be
one
dimensional,
yet
the
lens
of
thought
employed
by
Equus
Aerospace
takes
the
idea
of
time
to
the
level
of
an
“algorithm”
in
line
with
the
golden
ratio.
This
feature
of
time
is
then
applied
to
all
known
theoretical
constructs
of
physics.
Using
the
golden
ratio
was
considered
intuitive,
as
it
forms
the
basis
for
the
Fibonacci
sequence,
a
feature
found
everywhere
in
nature
as
a
process
of
the
natural
“development”
that nature constructs for itself “in time”; so it made sense.
To
achieve
this,
a
first
principle
basis
for
time
as
the
golden
ratio
was
theorised.
This
was
then
applied
as
an
“arrow
of
time”
algorithm
(before>now>after)
to
a
standard
definition
for
three-
dimensional
space
that
aligned
with
the
known
equations
for
gravity
and
electromagnetism,
together
with
the
known
formula
for
the
electron
shells
of
the
atom.
Upon
this
a
basic
wave-function
for
time
was
developed
(in
space)
with
the
understanding
that
from
every
point
of
time
in
space,
time
would
move
per
light
speed
in
an
omnidirectional
fashion,
and
thus
per
the
mathematics
of
a
perfect
sphere
in
uniform
space.
Upon
this
premise,
it
was
determined
that
the
newly
derived
wave-function
for
time
would
ultimately
need
to
abide
by
the
parameter
of
a
“circle”
in
a
complex
number
plane
along
each
axis
of
space
(the
use
of
a
complex
number
plane
was
an
intuitive
consideration
given
the
DNA
of
the
algorithm
for
time).
Once
this
entire
primordial
basis
for
time
and
space
was
established,
it
was
applied
to
all
known
ideas
in
physics,
and
the
results
are
nothing
short
of
amazing,
while
also
being “problematic” for contemporary theories regarding the origin and age of the universe.
Using
this
lens
of
thought
nonetheless,
this
common
thread
of
“time”
and
the
associated
algorithm,
gravity
has
been
linked
with
electromagnetism
in
a
way
standard
string
theory
could
not
achieve,
and
thus
a
mechanism
for
generating
gravity
from
electromagnetism
a
distinct
probability.
Yet
most
importantly,
this
new
lens
of
appraising
time-space
has
allowed
Equus
Aerospace
to
compare
what
is
good
science
and
what
is
just
pure
conjecture,
and
thus
what
is
a
good
research
and
exploration
adventure, and what is poised to fail.
In
respect
of
science,
and
the
centuries
of
its
striving,
the
theory
derived
using
this
algorithm
is
considered
as
an
application
tool,
and
not
necessarily
a
science
per-se,
as
the
weight
of
belief
in
science
remains
heavily
embedded
in
its
current
projected
research
(which
is
in
the
billions
of
dollars)
and
interpretation
of
those
results
(which
may
nonetheless
be
flawed).
Yet
this
application
tool
“is”
successful
in
achieving
what
contemporary
science
cannot,
and
that’s
a
concept
that’s
more
important for space agencies than pure conjecture.
Let us ask the question therefore, “what is considered more scientific?”:
(A)
a
theory
for
time
that
links
gravity
with
electromagnetism
and
all
other
observed
features
of
the
universe
yet
concludes
the
stars
are
mostly
an
illusion,
a
reflection
of
light
on
a
grand
quantum
entanglement
scale
through
a
Fibonacci-style
lens
of
time-
space.
or
(B)
the
current
quantum
mechanical
and
relativistic
theory
for
space-time
employing
only
a
one
dimensional
theory
for
time,
a
theory
that
is
unable
to
link
gravity
and
electromagnetism,
yet
a
theory
that
does
directly
link
the
observed
red
shift
effect
with
the
CMB
radiation
citing
the
reason
for
such
a
direct
link
as
a
hypothetical
big-
bang
event
across
the
observable
universe
entire,
inferring
the
stars
thus
must
be
real with no possibility of a process of manipulation of light as per option (A)
The
real
question
is,
“how
much
money
will
be
spent
over
this
century
trying
to
prove
a
make-
believe
theory
of
the
universe?
Can
we
be
more
practical,
thorough,
and
thus
intelligent,
with
our
theory
for
time
and
not
just
space?”.
“Can
we
be
greater
with
our
understanding
and
use
of
time
as
opposed to just shooting like a one-dimensional arrow into the unknown”?
Copyright © 2015 EQUUS AEROSPACE. All rights reserved. EQUUS AEROSPACE PTY. LTD. ACN: 156 061 791
